|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Table of contents Background, target group and rationale
|
Improving understanding of and responsiveness to people’s mental health needs
EVALUATION The activities will be evaluated to achieve the desired outcome. Policies will be reviewed twice during the whole project to analyse its effects on mentally ill people, their relatives and general population (which is well supported by Primary Mental Health Care, 2004). The role of community centres and home care visits will also be evaluated. The community centres will be frequently visited to see their efficiency and quality care. Statistically and clinically significant improvements will be recorded. The aim of this evaluation, basically, will be to achieve the desired outcome as mentioned below.
ANTICIPATED OUTCOMES, PLANS FOR SUSTAINABILITY AND DISSEMINATION OF RESULTS Outcomes that could be anticipated after this project are:
Outcome of this project will be disseminated by co ordination of services across lifespan and thus continuity of care can be achieved, which involves specialist mental health sector and primary care. Sustainability Sustainability of this project will depend upon:
This is reflected to the appropriateness of the intervention, and the way interventions are carried out and also to the degree to which people comply with an intervention.
This mean relative level of resources required (both material and personnel) to carry out an intervention. If the resources required are greater then available then interventions will be non sustainable within community.
If community realizes the benefit from activities then interventions is more likely to be sustainable. Transferability According to Brundtland (2001) transferability means ability of an intervention that is successful in one community to be applied to other communities. Factors which will affect the transferability will be degree and effectiveness of community and health infrastructure, effectiveness of partnership and inter sectoral collaboration along with the community participation. If interventions non sustainable in one community, it has less likelihood of being transferable to others communities.
REFERENCES Andrews, G. Henderson, S. and Wayne, W.H. (2001). Prevalence, co morbidity, disability and service utilization: overview of the Australian National Mental Health Survey. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178(17), 145–153. Bailey, E.L. Ricketts, S.K. Becker, D.R, et al. (1998) Do long-term day treatment clients benefit from supported employment? Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 22:24-29. Brundtland, H.G. (2001) Mental Health Around the World: Stop Exclusion: Dare to Care. Retrieved on 18-10-2004 from: WHO Charles, J. Wallace, J. Tauber, and R. Wilde, J. (1999) Rehab rounds: teaching fundamental workplace skills to persons with serious mental illness. American Psychiatric Association, 50:1147-1153. Harnois, G. and Gabriel, P. (2000) Mental Health and Work: Impact, Issues and Good Practices. Geneva: World Health Organization and International Labour Office. Naidoo, J. and Willis, J. (2000) Health Promotion: Foundation for Practice. Edinburgh: Balliere Tindall. Primary Mental Health Care. (2004) AERF Alcohol and Mental Illness Project: Guide to Evaluation. Retrieved on 16-10-2004 from: http://som.flinders.edu.au/FUSA/PARC/AERF_about_evaluation.htm World Health Organization. (2001) Mental health: strengthening mental health promotion. Retrieved on 16-10-2004 from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs220/en/ World Health Organization. (2004) Mental Health: The bare facts. Retrieved on 16-10-2004 from: http://www.who.int/mental_health/en/
|
| ||
Privacy policy . Copyright . Disclaimer
Contact : webmaster@welovelmc.com